Thursday, 16 June 2011

Interview with Kyle J. Bristow - June 2011 (Inc. the Solutrean Hypothesis)

Regarding the Solutrean Hypothesis, a couple of questions in this interview deal with this topic in depth but it is recommended that you read the whole interview. Also, if you are interested more in the Solutrean Hypothesis, scroll down to the bottom of this page and see the Editors links, especially the documentaries and the new 2012 booking that is now out by two Academics.

Here is my June 2011 interview with accomplished author, essayist, and white civil rights political activist Kyle J. Bristow. It was a great honour indeed to interview him and I sincerely thank him for sparing some if his valuable time to grant the Fyrnsidu Project this most interesting interview. Whilst an undergraduate law student at Michigan State University (MSU), Mr. Bristow was chairman of the universities chapter of the 'Young Americans for Freedom'. In this role as chairperson he sponsored speeches by a number of prominent personalities whom covered a variety of topics, including, amongst others, Congressman Tom Tancredo, and Jennifer Gratz who sued the MSU over its affirmative action policies, and whose case ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court. In addition, he is an accomplished author, essayist, white civil rights political activist, holder of an International Relations degree from MSU, Republican Party chairperson and delegate, and is currently attending the University of Toledo College of Law to become a lawyer. In early 2011, Bristow had become somewhat of a favourite of the $PLC and has featured in no less than three of its online defamatory pieces, including two in its so called 'Intelligence Report'. Bristow has needed, due to his vocal advocacy of immigration control and opposition to race based preferential treatment for non-whites, he has needed an armed police escort on no less than six occasions. After having earned notice from bookers and hosts at Fox News Channel, Bristow has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor and has been quoted on-air by Sean Hannity. Links to Mr. Bristow's radio interviews and articles can be found at the end of this interview, aditionally with documentary and news links that are also highly recommened. His highly recommended and phenomenal 2010 novel, White Apocalypse, can be purchased from Amazon UK here or Amazon US here.

Hello Mr. Bristow, and from across the seas I must state firstly that it is a real pleasure that you have spared a moment of your precious time to grant the Fyrnsidu Project this interview. Let me thank you unconditionally and out-rightly and hope that this will be of interest to our readers as I am sure it most undoubtedly will.

Thank you for the pleasure of being able to participate in your Fyrnsidu Project. Through the medium of the Internet, we are in a better position than our predecessors to bring to light the ideas of the New Right. I salute you for participating in political discourse; our civilization is too precious for Men of the West such as us to stand idly by as our heritage, culture, and freedom are eroded by the powers that be.

Please tell us a bit about your background - when and where were you born and what was your upbringing and education like?

I was born near Detroit, Michigan, in 1986 and subsequently attended public schools. In 2005, I began my studies at Michigan State University (“MSU”) and graduated with a degree in International Relations in 2008. I am currently attending law school at the University of Toledo in Ohio, and I will graduate in May of 2012.

From an early age I was subjected to leftist nonsense to varying degrees, and being a shy bookworm throughout middle school, I found myself holed up in my room reading books that dealt with philosophy, politics, and history. I started a Young Republicans’ Club while a senior at Chippewa Valley High School to combat the left-wing advocacy of the teachers, and when I arrived to MSU, I joined and then led the MSU chapter of the Young Americans for Freedom (“MSU-YAF”).

Whilst an undergraduate student at Michigan State University (MSU), you were the chairman of the universities chapter of the 'Young Americans for Freedom'. It is my understanding that whilst chairman you sponsored speeches by a number of prominent and some would say 'controversial' personalities, including Congressman Tom Tancredo, and British Member of the European Parliament, Nicholas J. Griffin, amongst others. Please can you tell us a bit more about the YAF and your political activism at MSU?

As the chairman of MSU-YAF, I led my organization by coordinating fundraising efforts, scheduling events, and arranging for prominent conservative intellectuals to come to campus to speak about their areas of expertise. Our speakers included Congressman Tom Tancredo, Nick Griffin of the British National Party, Chris Simcox of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, and Jennifer Gratz who sued—and took her case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court—the University of Michigan over their affirmative action policies. We faced much adversity due to our vocal conservative activism on such a left-wing campus, which has been captured well in a YouTube video that I made years ago:

I understand that you also have ties to the Republican Party leader Saul Anuzis, and that you have also served as a Republican delegate yourself. Please tell us about your political activism as a whole if you will.

With regards to my involvement with the Republican Party, I served as the vice chairman of it for Michigan’s 12
th congressional district while in high school, I have been thrice elected as a precinct delegate for the 29th precinct of the 12th congressional district of Michigan, I founded and served as the first president for the Chippewa Valley High School’s Young Republicans’ Club, and I was involved with the College Republicans chapter at MSU.

Although I have been involved with the Republican Party, I often find that I find candidates of the U.S. Constitution Party more agreeable to my philosophy. For the presidential primary of 2008, I voted for Ron Paul, and for the general election of 2008, I voted for Chuck Baldwin for president.

It is my understanding that you resigned from the YAF organization in 2008 to study for the LSAT (Law School Admissions) tests which is the entrance exam to enter law school. How is it going with your law study now? Also, the YAF no longer exists I believe, has anything taken its place?

I stepped down from my position as chairman of MSU-YAF during the spring of 2008 in order to study for the LSAT test, but I still remained involved with the group and served as the communications director until I graduated from MSU in December of 2008. MSU-YAF no longer exists; the organization became defunct after my predecessors graduated.

Although MSU-YAF is defunct, I recommend that your readers consider joining or giving donations to a new group called Youth for Western Civilization (“YWC”). Their website can be visited at and their members very much adhere to the philosophy of the New Right. YWC is based in the U.S., but I have heard that they are considering starting chapters abroad. They—and not YAF or any other organization—are the new vanguards of freedom and Western civilization on college campuses.

I very much enjoy law school and am eager to graduate and practice law; things are going very well for me.

What is this I hear about you having to have armed police escorts on a number of occasions?

As the chairman of MSU-YAF, I very vocally participated in political discourse and advocated positions that are antithetical to the leftist dogma that permeates college campuses today. For criticizing affirmative action, diversity, multiculturalism, illegal and legal immigration, and socialism, the Left blew a fuse and tried to deter us from speaking our minds. Not only have our speakers and I needed police protection, but one speaker, Chris Simcox, was encouraged to wear a bullet-proof vest during his speech at MSU.

I believe that you have appeared on the Fox News Channel, The O'Reilly Factor and have been quoted on-air by Sean Hannity. What were these experiences like?

It was surreal being interviewed by Bill O’Reilly on The O’Reilly Factor. Immediately after the Tancredo event, I drafted a press release and faxed it to major media organizations, and it promptly caught the attention of FOX News. All night long, we collected video footage and pictures that YAF members had taken at the event and forwarded them on to FOX News. The next day, FOX News sent a car to pick a friend and I up and drove us to the affiliate studio in downtown Lansing, Michigan, where we were interviewed via satellite connection.

After my interview on The O’Reilly Interview concluded that night, Congressman Tom Tancredo appeared on The Hannity & Colmes Show to talk about the violence that he was subjected to by the leftists.

The wildest part that evening, I think, was when Tancredo called me on my cell phone to thank me for everything and to tell me that he was proud of our steadfast activism in defense of conservatism.

Politically speaking, what do you you describe yourself as? What are your stances and views?

Politically, I would best be described as a paleoconservative with nationalist leanings. I often visit websites including American Renaissance (, Alternative Right (, and the Council of Conservative Citizens ( My favorite books include Death of the West by Pat Buchanan, The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail, and Imperium by Francis Parker Yockey.

You are the author of a fictional novel, White Apocalypse, that is doing extremely well. What is the premise of the novel?

My novel, White Apocalypse, is, indeed, doing very well. The book deals with the Solutrean Hypothesis, which posits that Europeans were the first people to arrive to and inhabit North America, and that they did so approximately 20,000 years ago (which is 8,000 years before the so-called “Native Americans” arrived by crossing the Bering Straits). There exists much evidence to support this theory, and it is covered-up by the powers that be—ethnic interest groups, political interest groups, and the U.S. government—because it serves so very much as a detriment to the historical narrative that is peddled these days.

The book can be purchased from at

Why did you choose to package and present your facts and ideas to the reader in the form of a novel, as a work of fiction, which enabled you to add elements of adventure, suspense and drama, as opposed to a more academically written publication where you wouldn't have found these? In essence, what made you go with a fictional novel as opposed to an academic tome?

The thought of writing a non-fictional account of the Solutrean Hypothesis actually never crossed my mind; I always just thought that, through the medium of fiction, I would be able to both entertain and educate my readers about this theory that is nothing short of being political-cultural-racial dynamite.

You are, in this overwhelmingly politically correct society, such a courageous person for taking a positive stand for white civil rights and identity. What has the view been of you from your colleagues and university staff? How do they look on you?

I appreciate your kind words regarding me being courageous for taking a positive stand for our people. We very much live in trying times, and had more of our forefathers taken a stand yesteryear, we would not be in the predicament that we are today. Our civilization—including its history, heroes, accomplishments, technics, and people—are now under an assault not seen since the times of Attila the Hun, Hannibal, or Genghis Khan. We—people like you and I who take a stand for our civilization and all that is right in the Cosmos—are truly the heirs to Arminius, Godfrey de Bouillon, Theodoric I, King Jan III Sobieski, Scipio, Charles Martel.

I read that you are in the 2nd year of law school with 2 more years to go. Is that correct? I ask because I have also heard that in law school in the U.S. Its actually 3 years total, 4 years to become an undergraduate and 3 years for law school. Could you clarify please?

In the United States, undergraduate studies are four years in length and law school lasts an additional three years. I earned my undergraduate degree in only 3.5 years, and I just finished my second year of law school. I only have about a semester-and-a-half left in order to graduate with a juris doctorate.

What are your views on modern academia and university education? I ask because I found Mr. Kurtagić's insights on modern academia very interesting, both trough his novel Mister (pages 142-144) and his article 'Memoirs of a Dissident Student in Postmodern Academia' and how the Freudo-Marxist and Liberalist takeover of academia is having an effect on students pouring out of Universities today. What are your views on this? How did this fair at MSU? Would you agree that although enlightened elements within our folk should, regardless of their detestation of modern academia, bite the bullet and follow through with it to earn that Ph.D. So that they can achieve with more credibility so much more in the future on the political and philosophical stage?

Colleges in the United States amount to nothing more than reeducation camps in which students pay thousands of dollars in tuition for the very same drivel that dissidents were force-fed in Stalin’s gulags years ago. College degrees are important, however, so people within the pro-West movement should still strive to get them for purposes of gaining credibility.

MSU, in my opinion, is thoroughly Marxist, which is best shown by the behavior of its students:

In order to get a real education these days, one would have to study on their own by reading books or discussing the issues with Right-thinking individuals. The Internet is a great medium by which the best books can be found.

I am sure that there have been those that behind closed doors have patted you on the back and congratulated you on your stances and opinions, but would never openly make this known in the open so to speak. Have you had this and if so what are your views on this?

We unfortunately live in an age in which people are not permitted to speak their minds; American politicians are the worst when it comes to pandering to political correctness—unlike Europe, the U.S. does not have anything like the British National Party, Vlaams Belang, Lega Nord, or the Austrian Freedom Party. I think that this is because the Left has been so very successful in turning America into a creedal nation—a nation in which its members must adhere to a certain philosophy instead of belonging to a certain race or culture—over the course of the last sixty years or so. Whereas Brits can join the BNP and say that they have a right to England because they are indigenous, white Americans are not so bold as to make such a claim about their own country. Due to our failure to act as a cohesive unit, white Americans are ceding control of their country, which is rapidly going the same route that Rhodesia and South Africa took decades ago.

Between affirmative action programs, wealth redistribution via welfare programs, and history revisionism that is peddled in American public schools and by Hollywood, white Americans are made to believe that they are second class citizens.

What are some of your interests and pastimes outside of politics?

I make homemade beer—German-style lagers and English-style ales are my favorites—and enjoy going to the shooting range when I am not studying law or working. At the shooting range, I use a custom-made AR-15 that a friend made for me years ago, as well as a Smith & Wesson Military & Police-style 9mm compact pistol. I am very proficient in both, and enjoy teaching friends how to use firearms.

Today, those who oppose the virtual genocide of their people and near destruction of their culture, heritage and traditions, are classed as racists and bigoted haters - at least this is directed to those Whites who attempt to counter this experiment for a one world latte coloured mono culture and folk. I reject this. I see us as the true 'anti-racists' and those who refer to us with idiotic labels such as Fascist and Nazi (almost always spewed from the mouths of those whom in reality have no real understanding of either term) - these 'genocidists' are the real haters and racists. I say this because I see with clarity that they are the ones who want to destroy distinctiveness and beauty, they are the ones that want to irreversibly bring true and cherished diversity to an end. They are the ones that are pushing for an end to individuality both on a singular and universal scale. They are the real haters. They are the ones that want to destroy the uniqueness of diversity and culture and heritage of all the different peoples of the world - with that of one in-distinctive mono-culture and race. I also note that these people who adhere to genocidism, these genocistists, praise those who want to 'Free Tibet' and call for action against those who want supremacy over this culture and people yet cannot see the double standard in their policy of a cultural and racial holocaust. You are praised and held on a pedestal if you counter the genocide of Tibetan culture, heritage and traditions yet you are a bigot and hater if you counter the systematic destruction of White culture, heritage, traditions and freedom. These same people often promote the destruction of unique beauty through mass, uncontrolled immigration and miscegenation yet also call those of us who criticise this and the racist, terrorist and supremacist State of Israel as evil and anti-Semitic - a State founded on racial segregation and for Jews as a people to preserve their own culture, etc. What are your views please?

The purpose of liberalism is to destroy Western civilization, which is synonymous with White civilization. This is what communist-turned-right-winger James Burnham argued in his excellent book that was published in the early 1960s, The Suicide of the West. Once the goal of liberalism is understood, everything about it—the actions of its adherents—, makes perfect sense.

In Pat Buchanan’s The Death of the West, the former presidential candidate noted that the leftists of the thoroughly Marxist Frankfurt School devised the tactic that they called “Critical Theory” to destroy Western civilization. Through this tactic, they lambaste everything that they think emanates from the Occident: paternalism, patriotism, ethnocentrism, nationalism, conservatism, heritage, and so on.

Liberals, simply put, hate White people. This is best demonstrated with how they adore Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe, who slaughtered white people and stole their property from them after he destroyed the African paradise that was once Rhodesia. Believe it or not, but in the early 1990s, Michigan State University flew Mugabe in to speak at the graduation ceremony—at which time they gave him an honorary degree in law! As the chairman of MSU-YAF, I led an effort to get MSU to revoke this honorary degree; this campaign can be found online at

Tell us a bit more about the Solutrean Hypothesi (wikipedia) of which you encompass in your novel?

The Solutrean Hypothesis posits that Europeans arrived to North America about 20,000 years ago, which predates the arrival to the continent by the so-called “Native Americans” who crossed the Bering Straits about 12,000 years ago. The theory is incredibly controversial because it holds that the whites who first arrived to North America are the true native Americans, and that the Asians who later arrived were responsible for their genocide.

Your first novel is a tremendous read and I sincerely commend you on it, and highly recommend it to others. In fact, I would say it is up their with the best of the 'pro-white' fiction out their, alongside Kurtagić's 'Mister', Kendall's 'Hold Back This Day', Covington's 'Northwest' novels, Wilson's 'Utopia X' and Raspail's 'Camp Of The Saints', amongst others. In respect to the above hypothesis, I note that the $PLC also commented on your book in a March 21, 2011 article by Leah Nelson in which she writes: "White Apocalypse is centered on the "Solutrean Hypothesis," a theory that has almost zero support among anthropologists but bravely insists that whites from Europe managed to cross the North Atlantic to North America 15,000 to 17,000 years ago, thus becoming the real "Native Americans." Bristow claims that the crossing in fact happened, and that those early whites were massacred by the later-arriving Asiatic people who crossed the ancient land bridge across the present-day Bering Strait. The book's hero is a white man on a mission to give the hypothesis a fair hearing." and in the Spring 2011 Issue, Number: 141 of the 'Intelligence Report' by the above mentioned $PLC, Alexander Zaitchik wrote a scathing assessment of your novel, in which he writes: "Stone Age Aryans: To the extent that Bristow's violent novel can be said to service an idea, that idea is a newly resurgent fad on the far-right known as the "Solutrean Hypothesis." The hero of White Apocalypse is on a mission to give the hypothesis its proper hearing. . The crux of Bristow's "repressed knowledge" is the belief that Stone Age European explorers first settled the North American continent millennia before the Asian settlers known to history as Native Americans." Although I would appreciate your comments on the review as a whole, I truly think your input would be very interesting indeed with regard to the segment below, especially as the following focus's on the 'Solutrean Hypothesis' in regard to comments made by it's main supportive archaeological scholars (sought from by the $PLC) after your books release:
"Unfortunately for Bristow and his fellow white nationalist Solutrean proponents, the hypothesis as understood even by sympathetic archeologists does not exactly jibe with their reading. Shortly after Bristow released his book, the watchdog group YAF Watch contacted Dennis Stanford, the most prominent proponent of the Solutrean Hypothesis and head of the National Museum of Natural History's Archaeology Division. His take on the crude appropriation of his ideas by white nationalists was not sympathetic. "There are several major problems" with using the Solutrean Hypothesis to advance a white nationalist racial politics, said Stanford. The biggest, he explained, is that "even if the Solutrean hypothesis is demonstrated, there is no evidence that these people were the same race as modern Europeans; in fact, they most likely were not the same race. Their origin in Europe is a major research question. At the present, most scholars believe the people who made the European Solutrean artifacts came out of North Africa [around] 25,000 years ago." The other leading proponent of the Solutrean Hypothesis, Bruce Bradley, is no better disposed to the efforts that Bristow and others are making to use it as intellectual fuel for the white power movement. "It is quite likely that [if] these events happened, [it was] before 'racial' diversification occurred," Bradley, now an associate professor of experimental archeology at the University of Exeter in England, told the Intelligence Report. "Any facile explanations about the possible implications in relation to modern history will certainly be discredited." [Ed. Note, Mr. Bristow comments on these points in his 2010 Oct 22 - The Right Perspective radio interview and is also covered in this news article.]

I appreciate your kind words. The left-wing Village Voice, did indeed, compare my novel to The Camp of the Saints, and many prominent individuals did praise my book prior to its publication.

Zaitchik is a radically left-wing pundit who is more interested in preserving the leftist Zeitgeist that plagues the West than in seeking truth. As far as I am concerned, Zaitchik and the rest of the SPLC shysters are in desperate need of attitude adjustments by Torquemada. The epitome of degenerate leftism is personified by the SPLC goons: Heidi Beirich—whose ego is as large as her body—, Morris Dees—whose former wife alleged that he had a propensity for perversion that would make any hardened pervert shudder in revulsion (, and Mark Potok—whose sniveling, trollish, pathetic behavior is so severe that it is now beginning to manifest itself in his physical appearance.

I would like to know your thoughts on the $PLCs reviews of your book and I would appreciate your response to each point it draws to scrutiny, especially the comments made by Stanford and Bradley and the quote which states that it has 'zero support among anthropologists'. I think this is only fair in regard to getting both sides of a story, and as such I think your commentary would be appreciated amongst your readers.

I wrote an entire book that contains subject matter that clearly refutes the claims made by Zaitchik; the evidence in defense of the Solutrean Hypothesis is too numerous to list in an interview such as this, but I encourage your readers to Google the cover-up of Kennewick Man or watch the YouTube video about the discovery of the racially white 8,000-year-old skeletons that were found in Florida (

The $PLC went on a long hysterical diatribe about how in this your novel this 'curly haired troll' gets shot and that you were advocating that people shoot them. I found it interesting that you have pointed out in a number of radio interviews that they make this connection when absolutely non of us are advocating violence in any way, but that the $PLC remained silent when movies like Machiete came out. Indeed, you noted that the reviewer of your book was very positive about the violent and racist Machete movie.

My novel, indeed, does not mention, nor does it describe, any person who works for the SPLC. That being said, it is rather telling that upon reading my novel one SPLC staff member immediately thought that the evil organization in my fictional novel that conspires with leftist terrorists who rape and murder white people was a stand-in for the SPLC.

Can you recommend any books or websites giving details of the Solutrean Hypothesis and Kennewick man and other finds that we might find of interest to keep abreast of latest developments and ones that happened some time ago?

A number of documentaries have been made about the Solutrean Hypothesis, such as Ice Age Columbus (on at The New York City-based The Right Perspective radio show also covers the latest developments with regards to the theory (

I have heard that Dr. Dennis J. Stanford and Dr. Bruce Bradley are co-authoring a book on the Solutrean Hypothesis. Can you tell us any more about this?

I have heard from sources that Dr. Stanford has written his magnum opus that proves the Solutrean Hypothesis as being true; I can only speculate as to why it has not been published at this point in time, though.

Studying law, what is your view on the attorney Edgar J. Steele case and verdict as a whole especially in respect of such open corruption on behalf of the government?

I would not put it past the U.S. government to manufacture evidence in order to convict a political dissident of a crime that they did not commit, because the U.S. government, after all, does have a history of doing just that through COINTELPRO (

If their was once thing you could change, what would it be?

Although I did much in defense of Western civilization over the years—such as organizing high-profile speaking engagements for right-wing activists, writing a book that sheds light on the Solutrean Hypothesis, and participating in a successful effort to outlaw affirmative action in Michigan—, I feel as if I have not done enough for our people and I regret not having done more.  If I could change the past, I would have organized more speaking engagements, more protests, and been more forceful in agitating for the ideals that will revitalize our civilization in time.

What is your vision of the future for America and our people, both within the U.S. And Europe? Indeed, what also is your view of the future for Europe as a whole and that of the world in general in the years to come? What are your views of the changing demographics and the effect it is having on western culture and civilisation?

I predict that Europe will be saved and that its satellites will die through racial and cultural amalgamation. By satellites, I refer to Australia, South Africa, Canada, Rhodesia—which is already long dead—, and the United States.

The reason why the satellites will die and Europe will survive is because Europeans, I believe, still have a loyalty to their racial and cultural heritage that is most palpable in how they join political parties that are ethnocentric in nature—such as the Vlaams Belang (Belgium), Lega Nord (Italy), Swiss People’s Party (Switzerland), British National Party (BNP), National Front (France), and the Austrian Freedom Party (Austria). These parties are gaining in political power every day. Europeans conceptualize their identity along racial-cultural lines; a German is one who is ethnically German and not a gastarbeiter; an Italian is one who is ethnically Italian; and so on.

The whites of the satellite countries conceptualize themselves along political rather than cultural or racial lines, which is best exemplified with how there is a concept that one can be “un-American” if they do not adhere to certain principles that have become central to the idea of what it means to be an American. There is no such thing, after all, of a German, Italian, Englishman, and so on, being considered “un-German,” “un-Italian,” or “un-English,” respectively, for not believing in certain ideals.

The satellite countries will die, because the white people there have ceded their sovereignty to foreign peoples whose civilizational identities are salient. In the U.S., for example, polls have been conducted in which it is shown that Mexican-Americans consider themselves “Mexican first, Americans second” and that American-born Muslims even sympathize at alarming rates with Islamic jihadists.

Just as multicultural Rome was conquered by the racially and culturally homogenous Germans, multicultural America will be conquered by foreigners as well. Civilizations die with their people, and demographic changes show that this is happening.

Who inspires you, both politically, philosophically, personally?

All the Warriors of the West who have taken a stand for our people by standing athwart history inspire me.  These people include the heroes of yesteryear, such as Charles Martel and Arminius, as well as modern-day people such as Pat Buchanan and American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor.

Philosophically, I believe Pat Buchanan, Francis Parker Yockey, Oswald Spengler, Sam Francis, and Russell Kirk have most inspired me.

What authors would you recommend to readers with a similar political and intellectual persuasion as yours?

I recommend books by Pat Buchanan—especially his Death of the West and Hitler, Churchill, and the Unnecessary War—, Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints, Francis Parker Yockey’s Imperium, William G. Simpson’s Which Way Western Man?, Ward Kendall’s Hold Back This Day, and Sam Francis’ Race and the American Prospect.

Although the prose of my book may not be up to par with Raspail or Kendall, I do also recommend my novel, White Apocalypse, in which I synthesized Western history in a way to show that our people have been subjected to barbarism at the hands of the Other from time immemorial.

I am often asked, mostly by whites but at times others, why I care about my race and its continued existence. Indeed, some have expressed interest but also questioned as to why it matters if our race dies out furthered by the query of isn't it just fine that we all just get along and work towards a better world in a multicultural existence. I would be interested in your view?

I have studied much in the way of political and economic theory over the years, and after contemplating the issues over countless hours, I have come to the conclusion that the issue of race is intrinsically tied to the issue of culture, and that both trump all other issues when it comes to the well being of a nation. The economy fluctuates between periods of prosperity and depression, but if race and culture are ever lost, then they are lost forever.

You are white, you are proud to be white and you want to see the continuance of your race, heritage, culture, and traditions, reach on into the future. This, despite what our detractors say, has absolutely nothing to do with 'hating' other races or cultures. Would I be right in this statement? What led and motivated you to become part of this movement, and what inspired you you to take the road of political activism?

I most certainly do not hate anyone—well, except for the leftists, of course!—, and I do not want Western civilization to fade away into the perennial abyss that has claimed so many other civilizations as its victims over millennia. I firmly believe that civilization and how it manifests itself through its technics enriches the world and that we would be worse off as a people without the legacy of the West.

I am a true conservative in the sense that i wish to preserve that which constitutes the Good.

Having been bandied about so much and so undeservedly (see for example the online documentary film, 'The Darkside of the ADL' - and major Jewish production 'Defamation' by Yoav Shamir (reviewed by Gilad Atzman) do you feel, as I do, that the derogatory term and epithet 'anti-semite' today has now become defunct. Would you agree? When I say this I mean that it has lost all true meaning because it is thrown around so willy-nilly and because this term is thrown around so much at undeserved targets it has lost it's true meaning and subsequently dishonours those that are truly victims of genuine 'anti-semitism.' Additionally, in 2002 syndicated columnist, journalist, and writer Michael Joseph Sobran stated "An anti-Semite used to mean a man who hated Jews. Now it means a man who is hated by Jews." and British Captain Archibald H. Maule Ramsey, M.P. stated in his circa 1952 publication 'The Nameless War' that  "The phrase 'anti-semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." - would you agree with any of the above and what is your opinion?

I agree wholeheartedly with Joe Sobran. “Anti-Semite” most certainly has come to mean someone who adheres to views that are adverse to those of the State of Israel.

The term “racist” is also used in a similar way; it was even invented by Lev Davidovich Bronstein (a/k/a Trotsky) to slander Europeans who were too proud of their heritage to submit to the will of the Communist International.  (

My opinion is that the Vanguards of the West must outright ignore the slurs used by the Left, which include: homophobe, xenophobe, racist, and anti-Semitic. Through the use of these insults, the Left has managed to devise the rules to the game that is political discourse, and if we follow their rules, they will win.

I have heard it advocated by activists that we should invent and use our own slurs against the Left—such as heterophobe, patriot-phobe, anti-Euro—, but this just cheapens political discourse and makes things too convoluted. I think that it would be best for our activists to instead use empirical data and other evidence to show that our ideals are superior to those of our adversaries.

Having been involved in patriotic, nationalist, and racial realist activism for some time, I am sure that you have come across the taboo subject of the 'Jewish Question' and their influence in the Western world (Zionist and Jewish Supremacist's, NOT all Jews collectively) - particularly in America:- (see academia's J. Mearsheimer and M. Walt's book 'The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, the subsequent documentary, Dr. Dukes videos and scholarly publication 'Jewish Supremacism' and journalist Mr. Oborne's documentey about the Israel Lobby in Britain, it's accompanying booklet, his Guardian piece (and courageous Jewish musician Gilad Atzmon's article on the documentary) and his Jewish colleagues foreword to the booklet, and his article in the Guardian and Mr. Websters in depth analysis of the documentary in his Occidental Observer article. Also see Alistair H. Fenner's controversial article here which also appeared here in an edited format regarding Britain being under Zionist control. It cannot be understated that in comparison to their tiny number as a percentage of the respective countries populations, they wield immense power. Unfortunately, I have observed great blame put onto collective Jewish shoulders for all that is wrong in our nations. Personally, I believe that, yes, Jewish Supremacists are a major factor, but we cannot forget the Zionist and gentile Christian Zionist Shabbos Goyim. Nevertheless, regardless of what power Jews or their lackeys wield, and they most certainly do (and I truly think this should be exposed), Whites are the real ones to blame. We are the architects of our own demise. We let this stranglehold on our integrity cement it's grip. It is we that need to look to the future and not the past. We need to look into the mirror rather than accuse others. We need to focus on a future rather than simply moaning about what once was and shaking an angry bitter fist into the air (and in regard to this I would highly recommend the book by Faye and it's review). This book and it's reviewers author factor in what we need to do in regard to moving forward rather than back. I might add that my opinion is that Whites focus too much energy on the negative, always moaning, always griping at what is holding us back, which does nothing to gain support. We need to offer a future, and focus also on the positive and what we can have and not solely on what we have lost. We need to offer something rather than angry bitter old men. Would you agree with this and what is your view on the topic? Do you think that because of the controversial nature of the subject of the 'Jewish Question', that it should be left alone, or in a free and democratic society, criticism should be had regardless? At this point, I would like to quote the Englishman A.K. Chesterton from his 1965 publication, 'The New Unhappy Lords: An Expose of Power Politics' - a statement of which I certainly hold to be true: "Whether or not One World is the secret final objective of Zionism, World Jewry is the most powerful single force on earth and it follows that all the major policies which have been ruthlessly pursued through the last several decades must have had the stamp of Jewish approval. Indeed common sense applied to such facts as have come to light must lead to the conclusion that the policies, directed against the most cherished Gentile values, were incubated by adroit Jewish brains and fulfilled, or carried to the verge of fulfilment, by the dynamism of the Jewish spirit. At the same time, so many Gentiles are associated with the conspiracy, both directly and through the formation of fronts, there are so many Gentile agents and agencies, and so many Gentile governments which have acquiesced in the conspiracy by falling into line with policies inimical to their own national interests, that it would be ludicrous to offload upon Jewish shoulders their own responsibility for the destruction, or near destruction, of Christendom and the Western World. Nevertheless, it would be equally ludicrous to deny the Jewish part, especially where it is admitted...'' "Had we of the Gentile nations stood firm in defence of our own traditions and values, instead of cravenly capitulating, the Jews would have remained what they ought to be - a small sect living contentedly and at peace with their neighbours, exercising neither national nor international power and entertaining no inordinate ambitions. That, as I wrote at the outset, is how most of them actually do live. That a minority of them has been able to mount such a stupendous drive for world power is not their fault but ours alone, and it is we who must put things right - or perish. The way to put things right is not to engage in 'hate campaigns' (which in any event more often than not play into Jewish hands) but to make a determined stand for our own legitimate and distinctive interests." As well as the above, would you agree with this statement and what is your opinion on this matter?

The issues of Judaism and Zionism involve the idea of civilizational conflict. Civilizations manifest themselves in different ways—the West, for example, is exemplified through what Spengler termed “Faustian Dynamism.” Although the West is in a contest with Judaic civilization—which, historically, has manifested itself through methods of parasitism—, it is also in contest with Islamic civilization, Buddhist civilization, Hindu civilization, Latin American civilization, the Orient, and also the pan-national postmodern secular and materialistic liberalism that is ever so prevalent today.

The issue of Zionism’s effect on the West was addressed by Yockey in his Imperium. Described as the “Culture-distorters,” Yockey argues that there exists a stratum within our society that is serving foreign interests at the expense of the West.

I think that we need to see the forest and not just the trees, so to speak. Although Zionism is adverse to the interests of the Occident, there are also other civilizational threats that also exist. The only reason why Zionism is such a large threat is because Protestants who adhere to the ideology of “Judeo-Christianity” have created a worldview in which Israel is held up on a pedestal. Catholics have traditionally opposed this view, but Vatican II changed things.

Only time will tell as to whether Zionism’s effects will destroy Western civilization, but I predict that adherence to the theology of Judeo-Christianity will fade in time and will weaken Zionism to such a degree that we won’t have to worry too much about it.

What is your view on the growing presence of Islam within America and Europe as a whole? It seems to me that here in the UK many focus on the 'Muslim menace' (and indeed we are capitulating in various ways, such as offering Halal meat in schools, hospitals, etc as the Daily Mail as recently exposed without the public's knowledge) - would you agree that Islam needs to be curtailed in the UK full stop, or do you see those that focus so much on this issue (BNP, EDL, etc) as simply sniping at the symptoms of a greater and deeper problem, as opposed to rather focusing on removing the cancerous cause at the root of it all - uncontrolled open border immigration, treasonous politically correct egalitarian liberal politicians, Zionist puppet masters behind international finance, mass media and politics? (please see for example Dr. David Duke's online radio interview with the Mike Conner of October 27th 2010 and his January 18th 2011 interview with Dr. Tomislav Sunić). What is your view?

This all goes back to my earlier answer regarding civilizational conflict. Islam is a threat to Western civilization not because it is a savage ideology, but because it is an ideology that is different from the traditional ethos of the West.  I would be no less concerned if peace-loving Buddhists were displacing Europeans than I am that Islam is on the rise in Europe—both distort Western culture.

The West deserves to be Western.

What plans do you have for the future, politically and otherwise and do you have any future plans for further texts, either fictional or factual?

I’m unfortunately too busy to write another book this summer, but I may run for elected office sometime in the next decade.

How can people contact you and do you maintain a website?

I used to maintain a website at [Ed. It is now up and running] that presented much evidence about the Solutrean Hypothesis, but it was hacked and I am working with Google to get it back. I can be emailed at bristow1[at]msu[dot]edu.

Mr. Bristow, this has indeed been a pleasure and very interesting and informative, as I am sure it will be to its readers, a true honour. Any final words?

I very much appreciate the time that you took interviewing me and also for everything you do in defense of our civilization. Keep up the great work!


Editors Links

Whilst a student as MSU Bristow was contacted by the New York based lawyer who operates (featured articles being only written by those with an advanced degree) to pen some essays for the website, one being 'Western Man and Liberalism.' His articles can be found at that website.

Radio Interviews
Voice of Reason radio network, Sunic Journal – Oct 19 2010 - listen or download
The Right Perspective radio show – Oct 22 2010 – listen or download
Voice of Reason Jamie Kelso show (review of book only) – Nov 01 2010 - listen or download
Voice of Reason Jamie Kelso show – Nov 12 2010 - listen or download
The Political Cesspool radio show – Nov 13 2010 - listen or download
Voice of Reason The European American House radio show – Apr 4 2011 - listen or download
The Right Perspective – Apr 15 2011 - listen or download
*  The Fighting Side Of Me – Jan 17 2012 - listen or download

There have been documentaries produced by National Geographic, History Channel, Discovery Channel, Science Channel, and Learning Channel regarding Kennewick Man and Solutreanism.
* Kennewick Man (alternative link)
The First Americans - Part 1: Kennewick Man 
The First Americans - Part 5: The Windover Bog People 
Also see Dr. Dennis Stanford's speech 'First Americans Were Europeans & Asians' and another speech: Ice-Age Discovery of the Americas.

On February 29th, 2012 a book that will rock the archaeological community to its core will be released - a book about the SOLUTREAN HYPOTHESIS! by Dr. Dennis Stanford and Bruce Bradely, 'Pre-Clovis First Americans: The Origin of America's Clovis Culture.'

NEW RADIO SHOW ABOUT THE BOOK: In his February 8, 2012 radio show Jamie Kelso opens the pages of the book whose arrival he has been awaiting for years: Dr. Dennis Stanford’s documentation of his Solutrean Hypothesis. Pre-publication copies of this long-awaited book, entitled “Across Atlantic Ice: The Origin of America’s Clovis Culture” can be bought now on Amazon. Kelso highly recommends a copy for every pro-White patriot. This book proves that the first humans to set foot in the New World were NOT Asians, they were White folks. And they did NOT come from Asia 12,000 years ago, instead they came from Europe some 19,000 years ago. And it is not Asiatic Indians who were the first victims of wars of ethnic cleansing here in North America…instead these late-arriving Asiatics were the aggressors in the dispossession of our own White ancestors who had arrived as much as 7,000 years prior to any non-Whites from Asia.
Here is my interview with Kyle Bristow about the Solutrean Hypothesis: 
You can order a copy of the new book here: Pre-Clovis First Americans: The Origin of America's Clovis Culture (Hardcover) Dennis Stanford, Bruce Bradely

News Links
* Kyle Bristow makies the big time! - Political Cesspool Radio - Jan 17, 2011
* SPLC Lies About Kyle Bristows Novel - Political Cesspool Radio - Oct 26, 2010

1 comment: